Fraudwatch: Ha ha, Spread Media - say adios to £20k!
I've just received a letter from the company that overlooks premium rate phone services in the UK, PhonepayPlus. I say 'company' as that's what they are, they're not a Government regulator - no, they're a non-profit making company made up of the companies they regulate.
Now to the letter I received and why...
For those not up to speed, I got spammed a couple of times earlier this year and paid for the privilege. I typed up a few posts, dug up a lot about the company and called up the so-called regulator - hence the above letter.
The main points in the above are:
I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand £20,000 isn't enough but on the other, other companies have gotten away with just £500 fines for similar breaches. The letter is a bit sketchy as regards to the details and how they came up with their conclusion as well as their fine. Instead they leave most of the juicy bits for the website HERE. It looks like Spread Media weren't the only shady company involved in this - I'll be delving deeper into this at a later date.
What exactly will the 6 month 'bar' mean to the company and the guy that runs it? Maybe he just needs to set up another company (he's had lots of practice). Where does it leave this little gem? That's way too funny and will need its own post!
Do PhonepayPlus really think it's a good idea for those of us scammed to hand over our full names, addresses and phone records to a company that clearly can't be trusted? It's bad enough they stole money from us, should we set up friends, family and colleagues for a future scam? And would you want to hand over your details to a man who's just lost £20,000 partly because of you? Yeah, I figured not!
Thinking out loud... there were 90 complainants - how many more were conned and:
The main points in the above are:
- PhonepayPlus received 90 complaints
- Spread Media were found in breach of the Code of Practice
- The company were Fined £20,000
- 'A 6 month bar on premium rate services promoted by reverse billed SMS...'
- Those wishing to get their money back need to handover their full name and address as well as a copy of their phone bill to the fraudsters (contacting them either by premium rate phone number or by snail mail)
I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand £20,000 isn't enough but on the other, other companies have gotten away with just £500 fines for similar breaches. The letter is a bit sketchy as regards to the details and how they came up with their conclusion as well as their fine. Instead they leave most of the juicy bits for the website HERE. It looks like Spread Media weren't the only shady company involved in this - I'll be delving deeper into this at a later date.
What exactly will the 6 month 'bar' mean to the company and the guy that runs it? Maybe he just needs to set up another company (he's had lots of practice). Where does it leave this little gem? That's way too funny and will need its own post!
Do PhonepayPlus really think it's a good idea for those of us scammed to hand over our full names, addresses and phone records to a company that clearly can't be trusted? It's bad enough they stole money from us, should we set up friends, family and colleagues for a future scam? And would you want to hand over your details to a man who's just lost £20,000 partly because of you? Yeah, I figured not!
Thinking out loud... there were 90 complainants - how many more were conned and:
- didn't realise it
- thought they'd subbed to the service when drunk
- thought their friends had subbed to the service for a laugh
- thought their kids had subbed to the service (and gave 'em a right rollicking over it)
- had no idea who to complain to
- sent STOP and couldn't be bothered to complain as they didn't have the time to chase it up?
My Groups
-
Vox Mobile Updated: Yesterday
-
Technology and I Updated: Yesterday
-
mobile lovers Updated: 5 days ago
Neighborhood
Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.
